ILTAF ULLAH versus MUHAMMAD ZAFARULLAH
CPC Review O XLVII KR Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII, R 1 Restoration of Restraint Non-prosecution dismissed Respondent's attorney's clerk's appeal, dismissing the petitioner's claim that the petitioner requested It was filed shortly after the expiration. In fact, the applicant's lawyer's clerk was returned by the office and the respondent's lawyer's defective clerk was buried after he had been shown a long list of pending cases. But then the request could not be returned. Finally, upon inquiry from the office of the High Court, he found that the application was returned from the office after an objection, no respondent's affidavit was filed on the request filed by the respondent's clerk, This case has been confirmed. Defendants from the defendants and claimed that the application appeared in the objections list, not really needed. There were no figures in the list of subsequent objections, the records kept by the High Court office clearly The petition filed by the respondent was supported by the petitioner, it was not due to any of the respondents fault that the application was delayed as there was no office either by placing the application on the list of objections or respondent. Be sure to formally send a note
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Naudero lawyer