Sections 2 (III) and (IV) of the Muslim Marriages Act 1939 constitute constitutional jurisdictional applicants' arguments against the dissolution of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and XLI, R 31. That the appellate court did not comply with the provisions of Order XLI, 31 31, was not created through the doctrine of judgment, the appellate court discussed the evidence of the parties and, after their appreciation, supported the reasons for the determination. Given the findings of court-recorded facts, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with by the High Court, especially when based on a misinterpretation of evidence. If not shown, the requests were dismissed from merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
