Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ versus ALI BEGUM

Law Evidence Order 1984 Art 129 (g) Gift Validity Dead Almut Proof of Defendants' Absence in the Evidence Box The supposed exception is that, generally, a party must enter the witness box to give evidence in their case, on the contrary facts which They were in the knowledge. Not partnering without a satisfactory explanation disclaims its case, speculation arising under the provisions of Art 129 (g), Constitution of Martyrdom, 1984, however, for these reasons, against the defendants. Aid could not be pressured. (i) Such an approach was not aggravated in the following two courts, and (ii) the party must prevail on the strength of its case, not through criticism or weakness of the defense in defending the opposition. , They are on to the plaintiffs they were not satisfied with. The absence of the defendants in the testimony could not establish the facts of the case established by the defendants. From the evidence on record, the facts of the donor, when it was at Lord Alumi at the time of his gift, have been satisfactorily proved. Not done [Mohammedan burdened lawer from fb area from Jalozai lawyer