GULZAR versus RATA
The appearance and absence of the parties to CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in O IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 164 and 131 ex-officio orders, limiting the plaintiff applicant Took part in the application for Was brought against him by the defendant but suddenly disappeared from action on an interim date which was being taken before the same officer in the same court. And because they were not summoned or no new notice was sought, the plaintiff petitioner filed an action against the former post separation request, run through Article 164 Which provided for a 30-day limit and not Article 181, the Limitation Act, which provided a three-year limit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Hattar lawyer
