Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GULZAR versus RATA


The appearance and absence of the parties to CPC's Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in O IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 164 and 131 ex-officio orders, limiting the plaintiff applicant Took part in the application for Was brought against him by the defendant but suddenly disappeared from action on an interim date which was being taken before the same officer in the same court. And because they were not summoned or no new notice was sought, the plaintiff petitioner filed an action against the former post separation request, run through Article 164 Which provided for a 30-day limit and not Article 181, the Limitation Act, which provided a three-year limit.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Theing Jattan More lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.