RAHIM BAKHSH versus THE STATE
There is no evidence relating to the killing of the accused by sections 302 and 201 of the accused, which does not indicate that he too has caused the disappearance. The blood-stained articles were recovered twelve days later when the statements of the prosecution witnesses against the accused were unreliable and one prosecutor's witness stated. It was deemed hostile to witness the extra-judicial confession of the offender. It was alleged that he did not stand an opportunity to explain his position on crime and did not ask questions about the murder so that it could be screened. Section 342, CCPC, charged the trial court that the suspect was taken advantage of and acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Chak Jhumra lawyer