Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code SCS Sessions 304, Part I, 96 and 100 were not intended to commit a crime but to protect the dignity of women illegally and on the complete unlawful act of the victim. The accused was first assaulted on two main parts of his person, witnesses deliberately suppressed the truth of the wounds caused by the accusations in his statements. The doctor has clearly stated that the wounds cannot be inflicted on himself. The Investigation Officer was also charged after the incident after the accused received fresh injuries at the time of his arrest. Under Section 234 Cr, CRPC took the clear stance that it was first attacked by the deceased and injured with sharp weapons and the accused lifted the knife from home to save his life. Had picked up from where the incident took place. There was ample evidence on record that the accused was injured during the incident at the hands of the accused, but in the P case, the material facts are suppressed when the defense version is too close to the facts, far more than the prosecution version. If the facts appear close, the prosecution presents very interesting testimony and fails to examine the independent witnesses. If the accused did not act on his injuries, he would have been executed. Therefore, the accused, accused of exercising his right to defend himself, has been charged with committing no crime and his case was covered in section 66 and covered was by, Done online advocate from Jatoi lawyer