Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MEMBER (JUDL.), CENRTAL BOARD OF REVENUE, KARACHI

Articles 17 and 129 of the Customs Act 1969 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Order for the possession and disposal of goods Petitioner ?? Constitutional jurisdiction against the seizure of goods before proper forum and disposal of goods after its appeal and review. Rejects The seized goods were part of a lot that was auctioned by the customs department in favor of a specific person, from whom the applicant purchased the seized goods, which was rejected by the authorities on the basis that the auctioned bags were of certain weight. Occurring when confiscated goods were found in bags of different weight, such an application was rejected, as well as an inquiry by the authority that the applicant was an addicted smuggler, speculated, and Proper evidence was not presented that proper indication could be obtained from the documents submitted by the appropriate applicant. The piece of goods he was transporting was part of the auction that was auctioned by authorities through the Customs Authorities Order and passed without legal authority, the High Court in the former constitutional jurisdiction Had separated it. online advocate from Murree lawyer