Find a Lawyer

ARIF KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 302, 148, 149 and 307 of the Trial County believe that the circumstances of the recovery of a blood-stained knife from the accused have been accepted as a piece of evidence to prove when the theft took effect a month and a half later. This happened when the accused was arrested and such recovery was supported. By the same testimony which was not acted upon by the trial court in the case of the co-accused Fact, that throughout the period the accused maintained the blood stain and he was competing against the natural probability and also The accused are said to have reinforced the prosecution's case. In the case of the accused, dismissed, accused, dismissed, the prosecution was not able to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. tax advocates from Quetta lawyer