SUFI MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 514 Bond Court arrest sought bail to explain the absence of the accused as the absence of the accused on the due date and further stated that Why the bonds offered and the bonds offered should not be imposed, the guarantee fails to provide any explanation whatsoever. Whoever makes it clear that the absence of the accused on the due date was without good reason or justification, the court, after imposing a fine of Rs 5,000, had fully complied with the provisions of section 514, Cr. The PC had shown a gentleness to it. Matter of fine under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer