Find a Lawyer

SOHNA versus THE STATE

Section 2 302 // O evidence, the testimony of two witnesses, the brother and nephew of the deceased was not mentioned in the FIR but the name was stated in the supplementary statement filed after the death of the deceased. This incident was not seen and was not introduced later. Police were present on the scene when the assailant opened fire, resulting in 24 injuries, severe injuries, knife wounds and domestic wounds. Shortly afterwards, gunfire shouted loudly from the nearby area. No one was attracted to the opportunity, although witnesses saw several people. The doctor was not blamed for the incident at the scene of the brutal murder, indicating that someone was present until the doctor said that it did not happen after sunset. Already recovered by the prosecution, not a specialist was sent a few days after receiving the gun, the presence of witnesses at the time of the appearance, was extremely suspicious and the recovery o f the blanks and the knives were of no avail. There was no consequence of furthering the case, the accused was acquitted under circumstances online advocate from Tando Jam lawyer