Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD JAMIL AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE


Section 302/34 First Information Reports were promptly recorded, excluding the possibility of forgery of the ocular account presented by natural and independent witnesses, which was a cross-examination examination and completed the prosecution case against the accused. Supports and is not subject to any material and credit waiver conflicts. It is not the nature that can be the target of fabricated conspiracies. Such witnesses were neither affiliated with the accused nor enemies of the accused nor had any motive or exaggeration. Neither has a chemical tester reported the involvement of innocent people, and serologists showed that blood-stained ground and blood-stained knives were recovered from human blood in this case. Further confirmation from ocular testimony

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Moro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.