MUHAMMAD JAMIL AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE
Section 302/34 First Information Reports were promptly recorded, excluding the possibility of forgery of the ocular account presented by natural and independent witnesses, which was a cross-examination examination and completed the prosecution case against the accused. Supports and is not subject to any material and credit waiver conflicts. It is not the nature that can be the target of fabricated conspiracies. Such witnesses were neither affiliated with the accused nor enemies of the accused nor had any motive or exaggeration. Neither has a chemical tester reported the involvement of innocent people, and serologists showed that blood-stained ground and blood-stained knives were recovered from human blood in this case. Further confirmation from ocular testimony
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Shahdad Pur lawyer
