Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AHMAD YAR versus RASOOL BAKHSH


Responding to Section 102 and 115 of the Code of Conduct, respondent maintains that the review filed by the applicant in the wake of the amendment to S. 102, CPC, is not enforceable, thereby increasing the permanent value of the case. Was made, and another appeal should have been filed. S. 102, CPC, is enshrined in the 1972 Ordinance XI, which made it clear that the pending appeal was rescinded only by the amending ordinance and that the institution of new second appeals was stopped, where the defendant defendants Due to the second appeal of Rs 1000 only, the scope of the case filed by the Ordinance XI was banned in the circumstances which were properly placed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Domeli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.