AHMAD YAR versus RASOOL BAKHSH
Responding to Section 102 and 115 of the Code of Conduct, respondent maintains that the review filed by the applicant in the wake of the amendment to S. 102, CPC, is not enforceable, thereby increasing the permanent value of the case. Was made, and another appeal should have been filed. S. 102, CPC, is enshrined in the 1972 Ordinance XI, which made it clear that the pending appeal was rescinded only by the amending ordinance and that the institution of new second appeals was stopped, where the defendant defendants Due to the second appeal of Rs 1000 only, the scope of the case filed by the Ordinance XI was banned in the circumstances which were properly placed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Lalamusa lawyer
