Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Sections 2 302/3434 and 4 304, Part I, evidence or testimony of the existence of any additional judicial confession is not available, and the prosecution's case remains on the evidence for the last time and in the case of serious recoveries. The request for grave and sudden provocation of the accused was delayed by five days. The possibility of consultation and consultation before filing the first information report is not excluded before filing the first information report The final version does not know the prosecution's version of combating natural probability for the last time and place of the deceased's death. The distance between where the victim was taken by the accused from where the body was not recovered was not the evidence of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses that was last seen in its true meaning. The recoveries were also taken to no advantage. It was said in the recovery note that the hatchets were stained with blood but b The witness's testimony in his statements to the court did not indicate that the hatchets were tainted. The blood prosecutor's case is not credible. While compromising, he was killed under cemetery and sudden outrage and instead was convicted under Section 304. Part I panel code, and his death sentence was sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment family advocate from Risalpur lawyer