Find a Lawyer

MALIK FAROOQ AHMAD KHOKHAR versus PEER AKHTAR HUSSAIN BODLA

Articles 133 and 137 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The location / route of public disturbance where public disturbance was alleged was not fully private but was a private passage and No evidence made it clear that there was a way. One public property or one widely used by the public as a major concession or public place was charged with closing a public space without interruption or interruption on the way to a serious dispute between the parties. The case and the circumstances of the case clearly showed that it was not proved before the courts that the accused was not the owner of the landed property and that he was using others as a public place, no document to show Documents or oral evidence are not available stating that the property is not attached to the bungalow. Oh. The accused was apprehended by the Settlement Authorities; it was reached by the courts that public property is illegal and not sustainable in law and magistracy. Section 133, the action of the Magistrate under the CRPC and the declaration of the disputed property in a public place had confiscated the work of the Magistrate's Civil Court, regarding the property deemed to be lawful, illegitimate and no legal consequence. It was directed to remove the alleged public disturbance. law firms from Tarbela lawyer