Find a Lawyer

HAZOOR BAKHSH versus THE STATE

Section 2 302/3434 incident happened in the dark of night, suspicion of the presence of witnesses, three fatal injuries to the head due to non-observation of the incident itself and a fatal injury to the neck and it was completely invasive. ? Witnesses say they were attracted to him. When their presence was heard after hearing the cries of the dead, eyewitnesses claimed that they identified the accused with a flashlight behind their back when they were running away. It is not enough that even in the dark night, the torch capable of clear identification has not been taken into custody for more than a month and a half after filing the challan in court which has led to the suspicion of the existence of a torch with the witnesses. Who was allegedly left behind after the attack but the investigating officer who saw the track himself was not Wow. Call any tracker to collect evidence of the footprints of the accused so that litigation fails to produce such evidence. His case is evidence of criminal arms recovery by interested witnesses. The evidence was presented so no evidence can be trusted that the accused admitted that he had accused the victim's son of having illicit relations with the daughter of one of the accused. Due to such suspicion, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused beyond suspicion. best advocate from Musakhel lawyer