Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN ALIAS MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Amendments to the Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 435 and 561 of the Sessions Judge's Section 302/34 order to summon an accused to prosecute, the Sanctions Code states. The verdict was recorded without any evidence or finding a preliminary case against him although he was found innocent and released by a magistrate. Police initially found the accused innocent. The complainant filed a private complaint against the accused under Sections Mag302 / 4, 4/34, was transferred to the Sessions Court and Stability was achieved with the estate case against the accused. Both cases were based on the same facts. A disciplinary trial was required, so either the state challan case could go to the accused and the co-accused, who was prosecuting them or a private complaint. The fact is that the Sessions Judge decided to hear the State Challan case, summoned the accused after facing a prosecution case, their proceedings did not result in any illegal interference of the Order of Sessions Judge. Declining to do so, refusing to interfere with the review patent advocate from Makli lawyer