Find a Lawyer

HABIBUR RAHMAN versus THE STATE

The 154 (1) (8) trafficking case of the Customs Act, 1969, faces several obvious legal weaknesses, including contradictions about the quantity of marijuana. Were taken. The inspector's customs, for inspection and in whose presence and whether it was kept in safe custody, and the Chemical Examiner's Chemical Examiner report was sent to date but not presented with the challan but when in court If the prosecution case was closed then the accused was the accused under this process. Missing opportunities to inspect documents in advance so that the piece of evidence was ready to be rejected, the Customs Laboratory chemical inspector's report was not reported to the government and as a chemical executor in evidence under Section 510, CR PC Cannot be used. The same hold was not called to prove, the prosecution failed to prove the accused against his accused, who was entitled to the benefit, it is doubtful. law websites from Pannu aqil lawyer