Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Plaintiff, in the testimony, denying the sale of his land with the plaintiff of the Outsz Act 1873 sections 10 and 11 of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), section 12 suit specific sale agreement Decided to make a decision. Based on the statements made by the defendants in the form of a note by the trial court, both the offer and the acceptance, the defendant subsequently pleaded that his offer be reviewed at first glance. Be resolved and the matter decided according to the requests of the documents. And the defendant's petitioner petitioner pleaded that since the trial court failed to record the parties' separate statements in exact terms, it was stated that they did not follow the record's presentation and acceptance in the form of a note. There may be nothing in the law relating to any form or procedure. Records of a presentation submitted by one party and its acceptance by the other record of the offer, were retained to resolve the parties' words, future disputes and disputes in pursuance of its acceptance and statement. Such a procedure was changed to the court process but not every change in the form would necessarily make the proceedings illegal or invalid, no suggestion was made by the applicant's defendant as was presented at trial. Judgment by the Court in your note, and in the case of separate statements, for failure to record the offer and acceptance. I have not failed. In the note, the two parties made the exact statement of choosing their method for resolving the dispute, best advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer