Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IKRAM ULLAH versus FAZAL AHMAD

Sections 4 and 22 (4) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, the Appellant's default, in default of payment of pre-trial, filed on the basis of his superior right as the owner of the property, when the appellant The pre-emptor failed to submit the gold, the appellant was allowed sufficient time to submit the gold e-penny but he failed to do so and gave no explanation as to his non-submission and the trial. Approved by the court. Neither any arbitrary nor irrevocable decision certified by the First Appellate Court can be granted due to a high rule, ie the owner can be requested in the State that the Supreme Court in its decision reported in PLD 1988 SC 287 Trial Court dismisses case for decision of Impact Retained best law firms from Eminabad lawyer