NATHEY KHAN versus MUHAMMAD USMAN
Section 8 Special Affidavit Applicant's argument that the oath taken was not, in fact, that the defendant's trial court did not record the parties' formal statements. But this was specifically stated by the trial court. In the affidavit when the aforesaid affidavit was held, in oath, in fact, the respondent was asked whether the oath taken by the defendant reflected the true state of affairs, if the defendant dared. So, no destructive action in response to the petitioner's offer should not be allowed to come to justice for the technical persons, therefore, the technical consequence of the oath proceedings cannot be avoided. Official statements were not recorded on special oath taking
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer