Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHANI versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE

Martial Law Regulation 1959 No. 9 Para 3 Government Land (Punjab) Act (Laws of 1915), Section 7 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1 and S7), Chap VII applicants responded under this order of the Border Area Committee. Allotted land to the applicants, military officials claim to the applicants that because of the two-century-old tenancy on the land earlier, the deputy commissioner offered to sell it through a letter and accepted it. He made a formal agreement with the provincial government to buy on installments and even submitted the first installment against receipt. The petitioner's complaint was that when the provincial government sold the land in their favor in the dispute, it was not open to the Border Area Committee to allocate the defendants by involuntary injunction to ascertain the respondents. The record fails to present that the method of making the applicants' tenancy land has expired. If the land was not available in the long run for applicants to be available or explicitly denied to military personnel, the option given to the applicant to purchase their tenant-owned land was a clear indication that the village They may have benefited from the whole land issue, the petitioner had more than a century's attachment to the land and was unlikely to abandon any part of it. Either way, if section 7 of the Government Colonies (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912 and Chapter VII of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 were considered, the applicants were given notice at all because for defense personnel without these procedures. Land cannot be shown. Held, m online advocate from Ziarat lawyer