TALIB HUSSAIN versus BARKAT ALI
From the CCC Code of Criminal Procedure Order XLI to the original decree O XLI, R 31 decision, in an unknown decision, after the contents of the First Appellate Court, mentioning the date of the case and the notice of the parties involved in the appeal , With the observation that this decision has reached legal and conclusive. The trial court's position of factualism was not to read any illegal, fragile, misleading or material evidence on record, so it could not be reversed, thereby dismissing the appeals. O XLI, R 31 was a violation, the CPC court was required to record its own findings on the shortcomings previously taken after independent review of the material by law, making the general observation that appeals settlement. Was not endorsed by the law, which resulted in the appeals filed by the parties. Remains to be settled by the District Judge himself
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Khanewal lawyer