MITHOO versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Para 7 41? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199? The fact that the lower forum was not raised? Such a plea in constitutional constitutional jurisdiction? ? Impact? Ten tenants later become co-owners of the joint lease with the purchase and the share of the entire land in their possession is listed in ad sari? "The tenant's job is that despite the fact that he was a joint venture, he did not take possession of it as a tenant under the owners of the second part, because he did not buy it, and To that extent, the applicant had never claimed before the revenue authorities that he was paying the bribe! The other partner? The joint mortgage owners and the same. There are questions of fact, which cannot allow for the first time in a constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Gari Habibullah lawyer
