REHMAT ALI versus NOOR MUHAMMAD
Section 2 302, 78 &, ?8rial and ? Court9 Trial Court's motion to recover evidence by refusal of the recovery court by denying motions, ocular evidence, and presenting the reasons for the same debate. With reference to , The CRPC, under which it also accused other accused of hurting the dead, was also acquitted by the trial court during the trial. He acted in self-defense but in his statement under section 342, CRPC, he stated that the accused was executed by other accused persons, Section 2 34 Cr, CRPC. The statement of the accused, which was neither on oath nor inspected, could not be used against other accused, acquitted the other accused in the circumstances. The order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Shemier lawyer