Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 25A & 38 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The criminal case of theft was dismissed without waiting and investigating the result of a criminal case against a workman's establishment, dismissing such employees. After the Criminal Court acquitted the Labor Court, the Labor Appellate Tribunal ordered the Labor Appellate Tribunal to order a confused labor appellate tribunal order that it was misunderstood. That the applicant did not say in his statement that the Labor Appellate Tribunal had backed up the benefits Editing such an order allowed to return. Employees in their complaint request that they remain unemployed on the date of their removal from employment, saying that it was not a source of income that had not been denied by the establishment where the claim was at all It was not inconsistent to be accepted. The order of the Labor Appellate Tribune was not only misunderstood by the law but was also misconstrued in fact, such a law would not have any legal effect in passing the law without legal authority and it was passed by the High Court Was optionally used.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
