Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

U. B. L. versus ABDUL KHALIQ


Sections 12 and 35 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), the XXXXI case on the absolute cancellation of the adhesive stamps on which the stamps were not canceled is not admissible in evidence where the conscience was admissible in evidence, the appeal. The developer did not have any proof. Particularly when the case was filed under section XXXVII, CPC 35 with section 35 of the same Act under section 12 of the Stamp Act, 1899, an indication that the stamps were not canceled, in evidence. Not acceptable, however, it may be noted that sub-section (1) of section 12 provides that adhesive stamps should be canceled in such a way as to re-use similar section (2). If such stamp is not canceled, the device will be considered non-stamped Section 35 provides that a document which is not legally sealed That would not be admissible in evidence

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.