Find a Lawyer

U. B. L. versus ABDUL KHALIQ

Sections 12 and 35 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), the XXXXI case on the absolute cancellation of the adhesive stamps on which the stamps were not canceled is not admissible in evidence where the conscience was admissible in evidence, the appeal. The developer did not have any proof. Particularly when the case was filed under section XXXVII, CPC 35 with section 35 of the same Act under section 12 of the Stamp Act, 1899, an indication that the stamps were not canceled, in evidence. Not acceptable, however, it may be noted that sub-section (1) of section 12 provides that adhesive stamps should be canceled in such a way as to re-use similar section (2). If such stamp is not canceled, the device will be considered non-stamped Section 35 provides that a document which is not legally sealed That would not be admissible in evidence best law firms from Wah Cantt lawyer