Find a Lawyer

IMRAN ANSARI versus MUHAMMAD RIFATULLAH ALVI

Sections 2 (g) and 15 (2) (vii), based on personal use, evict personal use Scope and the landlord's brothers and their children are not included in the limits of personal use so they are not acquired for their benefit. However, when the landlord was in possession of such relatives because it was due to him without paying the rent, he is considered to be in possession of the landlord and It would not be open to the landlord to say that such premises were not in his possession, in the possession of others for personal use for the benefit of the landlord for his wife and children. Was restricted, there was no room for any other relative of the landlord. pakistani advocates Pir Mahal lawyer