Further to the landlord's personal requirement under Sections 15 (2) (vii) and 21 (3), at the request of the landlord under section 2i (3), the appellate court found that the landlord's son, who was the owner of the rent matter, I was a minor during the pose. Before the tenant controller, who was not only an adult but married on appeal, the tenant denied the marriage of the landlord's son, and there is more evidence that the court has To agree that the landlord is needed for his son's residence. The great thing was, he was evicted because of a personal senseless need
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 1988
