THE OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE OF HIGH COURT OF SIND versus THE CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, LAHORE
Section 59A (1) State Duty Rules, 1950, R38: Cash by deceased on account of the absence of any strong evidence and in the absence that the deceased left cash on the date of his death, controller or appellate. Adding money as an amount. The tribunal did not have the justification to include the money left by the victim, the fact that the victim's son committed theft, which was reported to the police and that the victim's horse I was really fond of it, it won't really prove it. The deceased had a special sum on the date of his death
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
