Find a Lawyer

NAGHMANA ROOHI versus UNITED BANK LIMITED

Civil Procedure Code Orders VIII and O. VIII, RR 6, 7 and Section 115 of the CPC Written Statement Complaint against Plaintiff's Bank for Claim for Recovery of Money Under Bail Bond That the defendant employee terminated the bank's service. Before the expiry of the fixed term of five years, while the defendant was claiming some money in the employee's defense case as the trial court heard the plaintiff's bank case, the plaintiff's review of the judgment against the decision. The employee dismisses the HC's default claim There is no doubt that the respondent bank was entitled to receive the money as collateral under the guarantee bond, but at the same time the applicant employee also made his claim as default. Had proved, therefore, that it would be reasonable and reasonable if the penalty amount could be reduced substantially, in the High Court circumstances, It is rumored that the amount claimed by the applicant employee was less than that claimed by the defendant bank, but as a result of leaving the applicant's job before completing the five-year period. There will be a reasonable compensation for the damages suffered by the respondent. The High Court found that despite the parties' respective claims, neither party would be eligible to receive any money. Others top advocates from Kharian lawyer