Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIDDIQA BEGUM versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND


Civil Procedure Code Order XII of CPC Production, Expansion and Return of Documents O XIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Requests for the preparation of documents Requesting documents at the stage of proof of application of the jurisdiction. The request for was rejected. The trial court held that such documents were neither mentioned in the plaintiff nor in the plea of witnesses nor in the documents filed by the petitioner / plaintiff nor on the basis that the CPC was settled. The procedure was taken advantage of in connection with the preparation of such documents in the order passed by the trial court that the arbitral powers, which were held, were not invalid, however, in the event of a decision to prosecute. I can aggravate the matter, but it would not be appropriate for such a complaint to be used by the High Court constitutional jurisdiction.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Garh More lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.