Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHER KHAN & CO. versus KARACHI WATER AND SWERAGE BOARD

Central Public Works Department Code Para 4 Central Public Works Account Code, Chapters 9, 11 and 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicant's tender for construction of already pressurized cement concrete pipes was not approved. Due to the low supply of such pipes, the construction of steel pipes should have been accepted by the respondents instead of tenders which have been accepted in violation of the terms of advertisement and without any new tenders. Whether or not to seek fresh tenders for the supply of steel pipes, the required tender document assumes that contractors have been asked to offer other alternative pipes in place of the pre-stressed concrete pipes specified in the tender documents and Replacement pipes for all technical details of the material responsive contractor and some other contractors Was also referred to. Determined to use auto one that is intended for the benefit of the public, the tender of the Rightite Respondent Contractor is the lowest in relation to the approved item, instead of the solid pipe, the construction contract was given to it. That the defendant gave the contractor such contract was a good course of action for the benefit of the public claimant. There is a violation of the Central Public Works Department Code by not seeking tenders for steel pipes, as the applicant has failed to cite any provision of law which states that under the rule of law, the respondent authority is a corporate The institution is not a government department. If such a rule is considered to be a legal force for the Government Department, then the legal documents will be rejected. law websites from Skardu lawyer