Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIK

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIV of the Real Estate Mortgage Mortgage Code The principal borrower created the mortgage in favor of the appellant bank for being a simple mortgage with no ownership, so hardly any justification. It could have been possible for the appellant bank to pay the guardian's salary because the property remains in the possession of the creditor, there are no provisions in the registered mortgage agreement. Appellant Bank was not entitled to such penalty interest, insurance charges and other surgery charges charged by the borrower for payment of penalty interest by the borrower in payment of the mortgage money by the borrower. That it was taken by the appellant bank, can be obtained. Provide proof of this by the bank, provided such expenditure is considered necessary for the purposes of protection and protection of the mortgage. list of supreme court advocates from Jhand lawyer