ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED: IN RE versus ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED: IN RE
Ordinance of Companies 1984 Section 439 (6) Companies Act (VII of 1913), Sections 247 (1), (2) (3) Application for restoration of company name on the basis that the name of the companies is not applicable till the period. But it was discontinued which stopped doing so: The Business Materials of Record shows that during the relevant years, a company was not only operating but operating an active business, which was the return on earnings and earnings from those years. Obviously from the amount of The filing of the tax on which the petitioner was doing business and registering the name of the company was then proceeding with the expiry of the time limit set out under section 9 under9 of the Companies Ordinance, for filing such application Therefore, this company will not be named because the company name was removed under section 247, Companies Act, 1913, which does not specify any restriction to apply for the name of the company when it is removed. In the case, the notices issued to the applicant have shown that only the notices under sub-sections (3) and (5) of section 247, Companies Act, 1913, are in the official gazette. Were published but the notice issued under section (2) of the said section was not published in such Gazette, strictly requesting the restoration of the company name on the company register to the legal procedure prescribed by law. Was not banned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Madinah lawyer