Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 504 and 506B, in favor of adjudication of the custody of the minor daughter of an accused under trial for misuse of judicial dispute in court In favor of the jirga, the accused father of the parties under the Gardens and Wards Act agreed to hand over the child to the accused pending civil litigation, the parties pending the agreement but the complaining body failed to comply with such agreement. Suspected educated husbands have also refused to file complaints against the accused earlier. After making the allegations, there was no significant progress in the trial but no witnesses were examined. False complaints of harassment by the opposition were not uncommon in this country. It was difficult to get in your hand. The jirga and the mutual agreement between the parties to hand over the minor to the accused cannot be construed as a harsh and swift rule for the first AP to proceed to trial under Section 249A, CRPC and the High Court. Can always give relief in cases, hearing proceedings before trial court after trial top civil advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer