HUBE ALI versus THE STATE
Under the Ordinance of Banks (Special Courts) (IX of 1984), a bank employee allegedly violated the trust in relation to money in violation of the provisions of Pakistan Penal Code Section 408, Trust 6 which he received on the Branch Receipt. Was entrusted with the cashier's submission. The accused's money was proved through the testimony of the defendants, whose evidence was proved with the help of natural, straight forward and cash debit vouchers that had the defendant's signature on his back record, however, showing that the money in question was In connection with the inter-branch credit advice was prepared and the signing officers were affirmed that the International Branch Credit Advice was prepared only after registering to receive the cashier's receipt book and It was signed by the cashier, all the relevant officials / prosecutor's witnesses, including the manager, kept the matter to the mother. R was the case. Police are not notified for three months until the accused is found guilty of a misconduct allegation of breach of trust. A mess was created in the branch at the relevant time and with the collusion of another staff member The prosecution's testimony was no better than that of the accomplices, and the allegations were taken advantage of.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chitral lawyer