Sections 2 (XXX), 46, 46 (1) and 46 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Employees dismissed for allegations of corruption and misconduct Employee filed a Departmental Appeal instead of Complaint Notice Labor. The court accepted the complaint, which was upheld by the Labor Appellate Tribunal employee, was reinstated. Recent scrutiny of the facts of the lower parties was that after being promoted to the rank of Officer Grade III, he was no longer a worker / laborer. Therefore, his complaint was not authorized, nor did the Labor Court have the jurisdiction to maintain such a legal status that it depended on the work performed in an institution, not on the person's property. , Which was owned by him. While not performing his duties primarily in a governing body or administrative capacity, he cannot be called a worker or a worker. The worker or laborer was the one who was employed in a skilled, skilled or knowledgeable work manual. The manual and academic tasks to perform were both routine and rare, requiring no great action, imagination, discretion or supervision to pay for duties in the present work. A position, which was of his caretaker or administrative nature, but his duties cannot be considered administrative or administrative, therefore, regardless of the fact that the employee was a Grade III, he was still a laborer, Therefore, before the Labor Court was competent to file their grievance application and under section 46 (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the forums below had the power to use the word, which provided discretion. Laborer
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
