BENEDICT I. DE SOUZA versus KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY
Sindh Buildings Control Ordinance 1979 Section 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Four flats were purchased by a person by four different persons, including the applicant and the competing plaintiff. All the blocks of the flats were privately distributed by the seller and this fact was especially mentioned in the manual work. The competing defendant obtained permission from the authority to construct the building on his part of the property on the basis that the constitutional petition against the construction of the building stated that the property was not officially divided, the authority building plan Could not approve and in this plot was jointly entitled to the other. The pure, series merits of a constitutional petition require evidence to determine the extent of the buyer's right to interest and his interest in the property and the fact that the plot of land is privately owned. Was divided over and is now a separate part of each buyer unless there is any part of its construction and plot. The ground was concealed and such disputed questions could not be decided in the constitutional jurisdiction because similar required evidence should also be recorded, but the construction plan was not approved for the entire plot but for the part which the respondent Alihan contested, there was a constitutional petition against such construction by the applicant. Excluded as not authorized
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
