Find a Lawyer

ABU BAKAR versus SAFDAR ALI

The Appellant on the Decree for the Withdrawal of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), AXXI, R 99, asserts that he was not a tenant under the respondent landlord and was able to control the rent. Was not subject to the dismissal order approved by WAL. When the eviction request was made, the original tenant was someone else who claimed action in the premises of the premises to the appellant of the Court that the Assistant Commissioner had in his possession and he was required to declare the request. Was the tenant of the state suit filed by the appellant for. The civil court dismissed and the judgment of this court had become final evidence The record clearly shows that after the government levied the plot lease, the government plot was restored in favor of it after litigation. Was. Respondent landlord possession was acquired by the appellant during the trial without any consent of the respondent landlord and as such by the tenant controller, OXI, R99, C The appellant's application filed under the PC, which was rejected by the tenant controller, could not legally resist the eviction decree against the original tenant. inheritance advocates near Timergara lawyer