Find a Lawyer

MST.HAWABAI versus KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION

Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 11 Provisional Constitutional Order (1 of 1981), Article 15 (5) of Martial Law Order (Zone C) No. 130 of the Plaintiff Applicant of the CPC Plants O VII Small parts were leased. Applicants were challenged by Notices under MLO 130 to execute and register in their favor for additional area and additional work, which was filed under OVII, R 11, CPC. Was excluded because the case was stopped under Article 15 (5). ) Notices were issued to the applicants after their rejection of the Provisional Constitution Order 1981, for the cancellation of additional works and the applicants filed a case after receipt of the notice again, and the defendant again filed OVII, R 11 , Which was allowed under the CPC which was allowed because the previous case investigation was rejected under OVII, R 11, CPC, and therefore the second case was not sustained, because the addition Fresh notices were issued for the cancellation of Oh VI, R-11, the latest cause of action was charged for the purpose of CPC, so, at the trial The trial court based operations O VII, R I1, to dismiss the case was not justified under the CPC. The plaintiff's dismissal order was set aside and a trial was set for trial in which no additional person was hanged and the additional area to be formalized. His request for the matter was heard by the authorities, thus its application was due to this matter on various matters. Earlier than that jobs for advocates from Okara lawyer