NISAR AHMAD versus MESSRS NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD.
The appearance and absence of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of the CPC resulted in the OI, R 13 ex parte order, setting aside the applicant's defendant against whom the previous order was granted by the court in writing. The time for filing the statement was given and the extension was allowed. Over time, the applicant not only filed a written statement but also filed a reason for dismissing the previous party decree. And no affidavit was filed in support of the request of anyone who had sufficient cause of oath I can confirm based on the frequency. For absentee orders that approve a previous court order, no interference is sought
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
