HAJI AINUDDIN versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND
OXXX, RR 1 and 2 Contempt of Court contempt (LXIV of 1976), a Section 3 petitioner denied the contempt of court allegation that the orders issued by the High Court were strictly denied. Was observed, no re-affidavit was filed which required the respondents. The non-transfer, disputed or disputed piece of land was obeyed by the contempt court, with the observation that the ordering (Metro-POLITAN CORPORATION) was completed to complete the construction of the road and the piece of land. Will not refrain from stopping. It will be owned by the corporation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kakul lawyer
