NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB
Section 3, 10 (2) (xv) and 27 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Provincial Government The contract given to the Respondent / Contractor was terminated upon completion of 60% of the work under which reference to the arbitrator Where the respondent was found entitled to recover the balance. As a rule of court, the award was run as a rule of the court that the applicant / National Highway Authority was bound to fulfill the decision which Road had referred to Road in question to the National Highway District District Judge. Dismissed the review The National Highway Authority has said that the right of way has to be given. Under section 10 (2) (xv) of the National Highway Authority Act, 1993, the route of judicial roads has been declared as a national highway under section 10 (2) (xv) of the National Highway Authority Act, 1991. Has been agreed with. And federal government approval will be enforced free of charge and the word liability is not appreciated in the National High School without any obligation and condition. y The Authority Act, 1991, hence its general / dictionary meaning read with Section 10 (2) of the National Highway Authority Act of 1991, shows that a violation of the legal provisions of section 10 (2). No responsibility can be transferred to the National Highway Authority. xv) In violation of the National Highway Authority Act, 1991, an agreement between the parties was declared void and the law could not be implemented. Due to misuse of section 27 of the National Highway Authority Act, 1991, the reviewing court passed unanimous order. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
