Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus DARA GOTLA

Appeals for restoration of appeal 151 of the Code of Civil Code 1908 and O XLI, R 11 were dismissed for illegal prosecution. Council tried to obtain necessary information from the relevant branches regarding the re-entry of the appeal but failed to obtain the correct information.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 1988

• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ALIAS BAB00 v. THE STATE 1988 PCRLJ 1079
• AIJAZ ALI v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LARKANA 1988 CLC 1079
• SYED SAEED HASSAN v. ASAD KHAN AFRIDI 1988 PCRLJ 1080
• FIDA HUSSAIN SHAH v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY 1988 CLC 1080
• MUHAMMAD HASIL BHUTTO v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUKKUR 1988 CLC 1082
• NIZAMUDDIN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 1988 CLC 1084
• MUHAMMAD BALUCH KHAN v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SUKKUR 1988 CLC 1086
• FURQAN KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1988 PCRLJ 1086

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 1988 →

how to become a advocate from Shedani sharif lawyer

وکیل سے بات کریں مفت · منٹوں میں جواب