Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD SHAMIM ASGHAR versus R.D.A.

Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Liability Standalone Controversial Applicant claimed that his deceased father was running a company and that the company had purchased the plots at auction of the petitioner in the petition. Do not place any document on the record which shows that the company had an alliance with the plots. All the letters issued by the authorities were in the name of the applicant's late father, therefore, the applicant had no locus standi to file the petition in his personal capacity without obtaining any. There were disputed facts related to the court of jurisdiction authorized by the deceased father's legal heritage or his ability as the company's chairman, which cannot be resolved by constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court cannot determine from the available records whether The applicant was the sole surviving legal heir. The dead pet owner of the company was excluded under ition conditions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MATLOOB QADIR v. MUJAHID SHAH 2014 MLD 1587
• GHULAM RASOOL v. Rana MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 1590
• TASAWAR HAYAT v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1591
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. ZARAI TARAKIATI BANK LIMITED 2014 CLD 1596
• Mst. NASEEM KAUSAR v. AKASH alias AFTAB 2014 PCrLJ 1602
• FARRAH BASHIR v. MUHAMMAD UMAR TAHIR 2014 CLC 1605
• ABID HUSSAIN v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 2014 YLR 1605
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1613

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

best law firm from Bhara Kahu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes