Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus HAFIZ ABDUL MALIK

Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 16 (1) (2) Withdrawal against non-compliance defense of technical default temporary rental order on default An application has been filed in which the order has been approved by the Temporary Rental Authorization Authority at the rate examined, 3 years after the pre-case expiry, the default landlord has been excluded, paying the rent at that rate. I filed another application for default removal, which the authorized authority raised and the tenant knew about the tenant. He continued to submit the rent to the court on the terms of the temporary rent order approved in the first case because he did not know about the dismissal of the case, so it was rejected by the appellate court, in the opinion that the tenant was his Can't be unaware of. The withdrawal case against him for a long time when the tenant is usually vigilant about the eviction case and monitors its progress. Despite knowing about the dismissal and re-evaluation of the rent in the previous case, re-rent in the latter case will not be equivalent to a technical breakdown in technical matters. top advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer