MST. KULSOOM HUSSAIN ALI versus HAMEEDULLAH
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15, 16 (1) (2) and 21 (1) of the eviction proceeding non-compliance with a temporary rental order request the removal of the landlord on the defense strike on the date of its filing with the rent controller. The source was filed and only two days after the landlord's document was submitted, the hearing escaped leaving the application under S, 16 (1) for the rental order R, only for the tenant to request eviction. Notice was issued and notice of application for a temporary rent order was issued even though the tenant was ordered to issue, but the same was confirmed Along with Q, the tenant did not have a proper hearing and the rent controller gave the tenant time to file a written statement, but nonetheless temporarily approved the rental order against the tenant. Despite the fact that there is no date for hearing the petition. This respect was found to have resulted in the tenant's defense being terminated for failing to comply with the rental order which was approved by the tenant approved by the Rent Control. The affidavit was not supported, despite the landlord's request in this case, without the tenant receiving any notice and no inquiry in this regard, after the appellate court gave the parties proper notice under the remanding case. That was the decision I made.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Mian Walli lawyer