Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ASSOCIATED CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD. versus PAKISTAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

In order to restore the contract, section 64 of the Contract Act 1872, the plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the defendants asking them to study the feasibility of a hydropower scheme and to defend the defendants for services in accordance with the agreements. Agreed to pay a certain amount of which a part payment was made and the remainder to be made in monthly installments The defendants were given the right to terminate the contract on advance notice, which the defendants also had until the expiry date. The plaintiffs were liable to pay and, thereby, their percentage, cost of deduction At their original postings or storage locations, the plaintiffs reported termination of the said agreement with the plaintiffs, stating that the study of the hydroelectric scheme was intended and out of reach and therefore their managing director plaintiff. Could not enter through. Reconciliation unrelenting and unquestionably agrees with Burden that Managing Director was outside the jurisdiction not discharged by the defendants according to the agreement that the plaintiffs were entitled to special payment according to the decision of the suit in the defendants' case According to the plaintiff's decision, the plaintiffs must have earned the termination of the contract. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kotmomin lawyer