Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL BHATTI versus THE STATE

In the Ordinance of Banks (Special Courts), the provisions of section 10, 1984 (XLV of 1860), Sections 408, 468, 471 and 477, in association with an accused, co-employee, a bank accountant, were unauthorized and unlawful. A certain amount of money was withdrawn from a client's current account, signed as an accountant and signed as an accountant in the league as an incorrect account, both presenting their common intention, ledger on the account holder's folio. I made the same entry for cash loan and confirmed the transfer. He committed his own position as manager and thus forged valuable security / documents and deliberately seized the bank account fraudulently and fraudulently and dishonestly as the aforementioned document. He was alleged in his statement under the department while he was aware that it was a fake document. 342, confessed to signing a criminal code of conduct, controversial debit vouchers, and accused the accused of producing fake documents from dishonest and fraudulent documents, and the accused knew that the documents were to be used in a fraudulent way. And to be used for the purpose, the defendants were responsible for the commission of the offense under Sections 7171 & 7477A, punitive rules. The decision by the presiding officer was passed against the accused family advocate from Takhtbai lawyer