A.R. MOHAMED SIDDIK versus TRANS OCEANIC STEAMSHIP CO. LTD.
Under the Treaty Act 1872 section 65, the obligation to restore benefits or to pay for benefits does not apply to the Pakistan Party, which once received any benefits under the agreement which does not apply to the party. It was void to restore or reject such benefits. Compensation to the party from which he had received the same idea of advance freight and was unable to return despite disappointment with the contract, was not applicable to Pakistan, in view of the strange fact that English law had a section 65. I have made legal provisions. , The Contract Act in which there is no exception to the return of goods in advance in the event of frustration in the carriage of the cargo plaintiff was entitled to receive advance freight from the carrier of the goods.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Naukundi lawyer
